<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The War on Online Gambling: In Kentucky, It&#8217;s Getting Ridiculous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jenkinsfamilyblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/the-war-on-online-gambling-in-kentucky-its-getting-ridiculous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jenkinsfamilyblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/the-war-on-online-gambling-in-kentucky-its-getting-ridiculous/</link>
	<description>Nick, Rhonda, Reese, Finn, Archie, Ollie and Sarah Jenkins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:54:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Kentucky Online Gambling Decision: Closer Than It Should Have Been &#171; Jenkins Family Blog</title>
		<link>http://jenkinsfamilyblog.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/the-war-on-online-gambling-in-kentucky-its-getting-ridiculous/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>The Kentucky Online Gambling Decision: Closer Than It Should Have Been &#171; Jenkins Family Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenkinsfamilyblog.wordpress.com/?p=304#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] constitutes a &#8220;gambling device&#8221; under Kentucky law. Judge Keller was correct – as I argued a few months ago, such a conclusion does stretch credulity – but that’s more conclusion than reasoning. It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] constitutes a &#8220;gambling device&#8221; under Kentucky law. Judge Keller was correct – as I argued a few months ago, such a conclusion does stretch credulity – but that’s more conclusion than reasoning. It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
